Although a lot of research is done on the “Kristallnacht”of 1938 in the German Reich, so far there was no systematic approach for the events on the territory of today’s Free State of Saxony. The article introduces the state of research and sources, as well as the Saxon pogrom events and the histories of the people involved. At the same time, it discusses frequently used terms and narratives that are used in the tense field of historical research, commemorative culture, and individual memory. An outlook captures research desiderata and challenges that are also influenced by the approaching end of direct contemporary witnessing.
Archives
Einleitung zum Schwerpunkt: Der 9. November und die Geschichte der Juden
Issue 12 (2018), 23
Dear readers and dear friends of Medaon,
Within our editorial focus ‘November 9 and the Jews’, our Fall-issue 2018 provides contributions to this interpretation-laden date and to the many real and symbolic connections drawn to the date in the history of Jews. In her contribution, Karolin Kosuch raises questions about the radical Socialist Ideas of Jews in the 1918/19 Revolution. Roman Töppel and Wolfgang Reinicke dedicate their text to different aspects of November 9, 1923, the day of the failed Hitler-Ludendorff coup d’état. At the center of Daniel Ristau’s and Christoph Kreutzmüller’s contribution are the November Pogromes of 1938 on the basis of sources rarely paid attention to.
Beyond this, Alexander Friedman devotes himself to the biography of Eduard Goldstücker. He pays special attention to the anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic attacks against Goldstücker in wake of his vehement support of the Prague Spring fifty years ago.
Since digitalization in the field of history, and in Jewish history more specifically, has been a topic in past issues – we especially want to refer readers to our focal issue Zwischen Versprechungen und Herausforderungen. Perspektiven auf das Verhältnis von Digitalisierung und jüdischer Geschichte (17/2015)1– the editors of Medaon have decided to make it a permanent topic and founded the editorial section “Digitales”. We welcome Anna Menny and Nina Zellerhoff as editors and are delighted at their commitment. The aim is to critically reflect on challenges and perspectives of Jewish History in the digital Humanities and at the same time provide generic insights into new research projects. In this issue, we want to initiate this new thread with an introductory text by Gerben Zaagsma on the question, in how far it can be productive to discuss the specialties of Jewish Studies in digital Humanities. A specific example of the merits of the digital method can be drawn from the Footprints-Project, presented in a further contribution.
For these and all other contributions we wish you pleasant reading.
But we do not want to miss the chance to thank our long-term editorial member Hendrik Niether. He is leaving the editorial office for new professional challenges. He has been greatly responsible for the advancement of the journal and especially for creating the editorial section “Jüdisches Leben nach 1945”. We wish him a lot of success.
We could not have made this issue without the support of our reviewers. Corrections and translations were made by Cathleen Bürgelt, Cornelia Franz, Phillip Roth, Marcus Schaub, Margi Schellenberg, Patricia C. Sutcliffe und Steffen Schröter (text plus form) – we want to thank them very much!
The editors of Medaon, January 2019.
#zusammendenken − ein Angebot des Kompetenzzentrums für Prävention und Empowerment
Bilder der Bedrohung. Von Juden aufgenommene Fotos der Verfolgung
„ReMembering – Jüdische Lebenserinnerungen“ – Ein partizipatives Projekt zur Stadtgeschichte Leipzigs
Kurt Schilde: Frühe Novemberpogrome 1938 und das erste Opfer Robert Weinstein
„Denn wenn es einmal zu spät ist …“ Der Hitler-Ludendorff-Putsch vom 8./9. November 1923 aus jüdisch-bayerischer Perspektive
The events surrounding the Munich Putsch on the 8th and 9th of November 1923 are now regarded as thoroughly researched. However, little attention has been paid to the anti-Semitic thrust of the attempted coup and how Jews perceived the events. The present essay takes up this research question, examining the putsch from the point of view of the Jews in Bavaria and defining the reasons anti-Semitism had strengthened considerably in Bavaria after the revolution of 1918/19. It also explores the different reactions to this.
Re-Lektüre – Kautsky, Light and Shadow: Reading Benedikt Kautsky in 2018
9. November 1923: Der Hitlerputsch, Mein Kampf und die Verschärfung von Hitlers Judenhass
After his attempted putsch on November 9, 1923, whereupon he was sentenced as a traitor, Hitler found the time to write Mein Kampf. In an interview in July 1924, he pointed out that the process of writing the book made him aware that he had previously been much too liberal toward Judaism. He stated that he planned to “employ the strongest of weapons” in the future. This article explores the questions of when Hitler’s racist anti-Semitism began, what part Mein Kampf played in this development, and how Hitler’s anti-Semitism subsequently became increasingly radical.